A World Wide Committee of Democratic Correspondence: A Democracy Seminar Update


Thank you, your comment will be visible after it has been approved.


August 11, 2021

A World Wide Committee of Democratic Correspondence: A Democracy Seminar Update

  • Democracy Seminar
  • substack

When we were considering reviving the Democracy Seminar, I recalled my 18th century history and the Committees of Correspondence formed by the Americans to communicate and coordinate their opposition to British rule of the colonies. Given the emerging, worldwide, new forms of postmodern twenty first century tyranny, I, thus, came up with a compact description of our activities: “a world wide committee of democratic correspondence.” The idea was the result of my conviction that at this point “we’re all in the same boat,” as I later put it.

Our committee has been active particularly in recent months. The big news is that we now have our own online platform.

Our work that had been shared on Public Seminar and the website of the Transregional Center for Democratic Studies, is now consolidated, permitting us to show the full range of our activities and to strengthen our committee, answering the call from our first conference “democrats of the world unite.” We also now have our own twitter.

Beyond consolidation, we are sharing new features: webinars, recorded dialogues and debates, in “watch and listen,” the first of a series of forums, “thinking about the crisis of liberal democracy through Polish lens,” and the sharing of news and events in our worldwide committee. We are hoping that this will lead to a more interactive seminar, expanding our circle of correspondents, enriching our deliberations, strengthening our capacity to respond to the clear and present dangers.

The forum is on The End of the Liberal Mind: Poland’s New Politics edited by Karolina Wigura and Jarosław Kuisz, with their contributions, along with contributions from Rafał Matyja, Stefan Sękowski, Maciej Gdula, and Tomasz Sawczuk. 

contributed to the forum. I was struck by how the authors, ranging across the political spectrum, from the democratic left, right and center, were all critical of the authoritarian developments in Poland. They documented and analyzed liberal democratic failures, but also enacted a liberal democratic culture in their mutually respectful, complimentary, but also competing analyses. The book revealed a liberal democratic ethos in action. 

I also believe the contributions to our symposium do the same: Szabolcs LászlóDagmar Kusá,Oana BalutaHelena Chmielewska-Szlajfer, along with my piece, Karolina Wigura’s introduction to the book and Jeffrey C. Isaac’s introduction to the forum. The pieces range from the highly critical to the deeply appreciative, recognizing the comparative similarities and differences of the Polish experience, with experiences in Hungary, Slovakia, Romania, and the United States. 

Such comparative analyses with alternative political commitments and theoretical interpretations from across the globe, including participants from North and South America, East and West Europe, Asia, and Africa, constitute the Democracy Seminar. Edited versions of our many meetings, seminars, dialogues, and debates can be seen in our “watch and listen” section. We have worked to turn necessity into a new strength, making our meetings easily accessible, reaching a worldwide audience. You can now consider along with us:

It has become a truism: we live in dark times. The notion is not particularly meaningful if all that is meant is that things are bad: to play with the language of Orwell: that Modi, Bolsonaro, Kaczynski, Orban, Trump, et al, are “un-good.” But something more precise is at issue, I believe, drawing upon the insights of Hannah Arendt. The prospects of seeing each other, and coordinating and acting together, are dimmed. We can’t perceive each other and agree upon the facts on the ground. Societies are polarized politically, with a media constituted bifurcated public life. As is broadly recognized, we don’t simply have differences of opinion, perspectives, and interests, across political divides, we have different alternative facts and truths. And people who need to work together, who share commitments to democracy, decency, and social justice. Our worldwide committee of democratic correspondence is dedicated to illuminating this situation. 

Jeffrey C. Goldfarb is the Michael E. Gellert Professor of Sociology at The New School for Social Research. This piece was originally published on our Substack.


Leave a reaction with this article